While there will no doubt be much confected backslapping at the few parts of this weekend’s Green State conference which are open to the media, internally the Greens are racked with dissent and concern about their sell-out to Labor, and what it means for their longer-term future.

Prior to the election Nick McKim argued that the Greens presented a change to the “old politics” of the two major parties, and that voting Green would produce real results on issues such as climate change, forestry and cost of living.

Yet since the election Mr McKim’s most notable achievements include:
• Cycling up Mount Wellington with David Bartlett to do a deal that David Bartlett promised would never happen;
• Supporting Labor breaking their 5 percent electricity price cap promise; and
• Being photographed with a hot water bottle.

The fact is, the Greens have sold their principles for the perks of power, and many Greens members are very concerned about the party’s future direction.

Some of the internal Green party members’ concerns which will be discussed behind closed doors this weekend include:

NOT DELIVERING WHAT THEY PROMISED

Major Green election promises not delivered include:
• Statewide Mini-Metro
• Giving prisoners the vote
• Free public transport for all students
• Apple-a-Day for students
• Solar rebates
• Axing the Kingston Bypass
• Ending native forestry in Tasmania.
 
REVELLING IN THE PERKS OF OFFICE

• CHAFFUER-DRIVEN LIMOUSINES
Upon becoming Leader of the Greens in July 2008, McKim declined the use of a chauffeur-driven limousine, saying “politicians cannot continue to ask the community to reduce emissions without ourselves showing leadership, and that means taking action not just talking about it” (Nick McKim media release, 15 July 2008).

Upon becoming minister for Climate Change, he accepted use of the very same 8-cylinder chauffeur-driven limousine on “road safety and workload grounds” (Nick McKim Media release, 3 May 201).

• HOSPITALITY HYPOCRISY
Despite opposing the Hawthorn football deal, both McKim and O’Connor accepted invitations to attend the “Tasmania Day” lunch at the MCG on 29th August between. They have even booked airfares and accommodation. They only pulled out at the last minute when questions were asked by the media (Mercury, 28th August 2010).
 
SUPPORTING HIGHER ELECTRICITY PRICES

Despite campaigning heavily on the issue of cost of living during the election campaign, the Greens supported the Government’s decision to break their five-percent electricity price cap promise, meaning higher electricity prices for all Tasmanians. Despite a $46 million budget windfall, the Greens’ now refuse to use some of this money to cap electricity prices as promised.
 
RUNNING AWAY FROM THE DIFFICULT DECISIONS

Despite being the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, McKim has flagged that should the Government proceed with a plan to build the Brighton Bypass against the wishes of the aboriginal community, he will walk out of Cabinet rather than attend to argue the case (Examiner, 11th August 2010).
 
SUPPORTING POLICY THEY PREVIOUSLY OPPOSED

• BROAD-ACRE HOUSING ESTATES
Despite consistently opposing broad-acre public housing estates, Cassy O’Connor as the responsible Minister released a housing policy which involved public housing on broad-acre estates. (Cassy O’Connor media release, 18th August). The plan drew criticism from her Green backbench colleague Kim Booth (Examiner, 19th August 2010).

• GAMBLING HARM MINIMISATION MEASURES
As Secretary to Cabinet, Cassy O’Connor welcomed new self-exclusion laws and other harm minimisation measures for problem gamblers, despite taking a policy to the election to completely ban poker machines (Media release 18th August 2010). This also drew the ire of her backbench colleague Kim Booth (Mercury, 19th August 2010).

SUPPORT FOR A PULP MILL?

Nick McKim has indicated he is prepared to sell-out the ultimate Green value and support a pulp mill in Tasmania:
A proposal for another pulp mill in Tasmania, we are prepared to look at, as long as it is put through the proper processes” (Mercury, 27th August 2010).

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Community Development
Saturday, 5 September 2010

 

Today in State Parliament, I moved a motion calling on the Labor-Green Government to start working with community groups who will be displaced following the Glenorchy City Council’s decision to sub-lease the Glenorchy Civic Centre.

I also tabled a petition that included 399 representations from the people of Tasmania concerned about this decision.

On 19 July 2010, the Glenorchy City Council voted to investigate sub-leasing the Centre in order to compensate for financial difficulties facing the Council. This decision left a number of community groups that relied on the affordable and accessible facility out in the cold.

Many of these groups, such as the School for Seniors, will struggle to find suitable alternative locations. The Centre easily accommodates the average 80 to 90 people who attend the School for Seniors, many of whom have hearing difficulties, which the Centre caters for with an audio loop, and require direct access to public transport that is conveniently located near-by.

The work done by these community groups cannot be underestimated and if the Labor-Green Government doesn’t step in to help, it will reflect poorly on their commitment to the Glenorchy community, and their capacity to deliver for local communities.

I hope to gain the full support of Parliament to secure the future of this Centre, which is a vital need to the Glenorchy community.

A copy of the motion is included below:

I give notice that on tomorrow I shall move, that the House:

1. Notes the Glenorchy City Council’s proposal by a decision made on Monday 19 July 2010 to look at sub-leasing the Glenorchy Civic Centre, leaving many community groups, including the Glenorchy School for Seniors, Glenorchy and Moonah Probus Clubs, Glenorchy Christian Outreach Centre and the Glenorchy Pensioners Unions, without a suitable venue for their meetings and activities;
2. Supports the retention of the Glenorchy Civic Centre as a wonderful public venue which provides a fully-equipped, centrally locates venue for a range of groups to support the needs of Glenorchy residents and community groups;
3. Recognises that the viability of some of these community services is now in question;
4. Calls on the Labor-Green Government to work with the Glenorchy City Council to reconsider its decision and to also work with the affected community groups if they do require alternative venues should the Glenorchy City Council proceed to sub-lease the Glenorchy Civic Centre.

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Community Development
Wednesday, 1 September 2010

 

Community Development Minister Nick McKim has once again sold out on the principals of the Greens merely for the perks of political office.

Despite attempting to convince The House in State Parliament today that he had “not compromised on a single Greens policy”, Mr McKim has again shown how low he will go as Tasmanians continue to suffer from the increasing cost of living.

Prior to the State Election earlier this year, the Greens promised to keep the cost of living down, but as soon as Mr McKim and fellow cabinet member Cassy O’Conner settled into their new offices, the Greens have reneged on that promise, by supporting Labor in breaking their five per cent electricity price cap.

Mr McKim is happy to walk out of cabinet on a tax measure that would have saved 130 jobs, but nods in agreement when Labor proposes to break an election promise and puts up electricity prices by 15 percent for all Tasmanians.

Mr McKim was quoted prior to the election as saying that “Tasmanians have been doing it tough under Labor”. It now seems that Tasmanians will do it just as tough under the Greens, as they continue to be hit with exorbitant price hikes for electricity.

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Community Development
Tuesday, 31 August 2010

 

One week ago, the Premier David Bartlett gave away prime real estate on Hobart’s waterfront without an open and transparent process, denying that he needed to consult with the people of the city, waterfront businesses and private enterprise.  Now he has tried to fool people into believing he is the king of consultation by opening discussion and calling for expressions of interest on the Brooke St Pier.

This is after he completely bungled his first effort at ‘public consultation’ on developing the Pier. 

Criticism by Bill Harvey, Greens Alderman of Hobart City Council (letters, Saturday Mercury, 28/8/10) is misdirected. The Tasmanian Liberals’ position is not that we do not support an Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies or that Princes Wharf Shed No.2 may be an appropriate venue for such a use, but that this result should have been determined by a proper open and transparent tender process, calling for expressions of interest (as was the case with Macquarie Wharf Shed No.1).

Why is Princes Wharf 2 any different from Brooke St Pier or Macquarie Wharf Shed No.1? 

When faced with a previous waterfront development the Greens’ Cassy O’Connor said the proposal with no public tender process “alienated Tasmanians who love Sullivans Cove because they had no say in the matter, and it provoked suspicions of special deals for special mates.” She then took aim at a “nod and wink” approval process by the State Government in exchange for a commitment by a consortium to provide for an infrastructure project on the waterfront. 

However in Parliament last week Ms O’Connor seemed comfortable in bending her integrity by supporting the ‘behind closed doors’ Princes Warf 2 waterfront deal that Mr Bartlett and his Government are willing to push through without testing the market.

The Greens cannot have it both ways; they either believe in a Government that adheres to transparent processes, or they support the Government’s nod and wink secret deals. This is the height of hypocrisy and undermines community and business confidence through the Government’s lack of consistency.

Regards

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Planning
Liberal Member for Denison

 

The Premier, David Bartlett, today continued to take the Tasmania people as fools by picking and choosing when he wishes to engage in his so called ‘public consultation’.

Today David Bartlett has said: “I’ve got an open mind about the mix of public or commercial involvement...I’m waiting to see what the community and port users have to say”.

One week ago Mr. Bartlett gave away prime real estate on Hobart’s waterfront, denying that he needed to consult with the people of the city and waterfront businesses.  Now he has tried to fool people into believing he is king of consultation by opening discussion on the Brooke St Pier.

This is after he completely bungled his first effort at ‘public consultation’ on developing the Pier. 

Why is Princes Wharf 2 any different from Brooke St Pier? 

This is the height of hypocrisy and undermines community and business confidence through the Government’s lack of consistency.

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Planning
Thursday, 26 August 2010

 

Cassy O’Connor has today shown how low she is willing to go to hold onto the perks of being a Minister. 

When faced with a previous waterfront development Ms O’Connor said the proposal with no public tender process “alienated Tasmanians who love Sullivans Cove because they had no say in the matter, and it provoked suspicions of special deals for special mates.”

She then took aim at a “nod and wink” approval process by the State Government in exchange for a commitment by a consortium to provide for an infrastructure project on the waterfront. 

However in Parliament today Ms O’Connor seemed comfortable in bending her integrity by supporting the ‘behind closed doors’ Princes Warf 2 waterfront deal that Mr Bartlett and his Government are willing to push through. 

Ms O’Connor cannot have it both ways; she either believes in a Government that adheres to transparent processes, or she supports the Government’s nod and wink secret deals. 

Elise Archer MP
Shadow Minister for Planning
Tuesday, 24 August 2010

 
More Articles...